Superbowl XLIV, Colts or Saints? |
Superbowl XLIV, Colts or Saints? |
Feb 4 2010, 11:36 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Veterans Joined: 13-February 09 |
Well the Superbowl is this Sunday. Yay!
I'm pretty excited, I like football quite a bit. Not as much as baseball, but whatever. I'm rooting for the Colts, I really hope they win! Me and my friends are having a big watch party. I can't wait. :D So who are you rooting for? Do you even care? |
|
|
Feb 4 2010, 11:48 PM
Post
#2
|
|
It's your world now. Group: Veterans Joined: 13-January 07 |
The comma afters Colts is unnecessary.
|
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 12:29 AM
Post
#3
|
|
The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady Group: Site Contributor Joined: 22-June 09 |
No, the comma is not unnecessary.
Anyway, I don't really care. I don't watch football . . . or any sports for that matter. |
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 12:33 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Bigger. Better. Toaster. Group: Veterans Joined: 16-March 07 |
I'm rooting for the Colts even though I'm a diehard Jets fan. I want to see Peyton get his second ring, he deserves it big time.
I care to an extent. I mean, I can't be too involved just because it isn't my team, but I do play football and like watching them play and observing moves. Baseball is cool and all, but it's too slow paced to watch for me. Football is better. |
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 12:36 AM
Post
#5
|
|
It's your world now. Group: Veterans Joined: 13-January 07 |
Yes, the comma after Colts is so unnecessary. "Colts, or Saints," what's up with that? "Colts or Saints," please.
|
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 12:38 AM
Post
#6
|
|
The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady Group: Site Contributor Joined: 22-June 09 |
I thought you were talking about the comma in the post, not the topic description. =/
|
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 12:40 AM
Post
#7
|
|
It's your world now. Group: Veterans Joined: 13-January 07 |
That comma after Colts in the post, I also believe should not exist. I feel a period or semicolon would be better.
|
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 12:46 AM
Post
#8
|
|
The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady Group: Site Contributor Joined: 22-June 09 |
The addition of the word 'and' after the comma in the post is the simplest solution.
|
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 12:49 AM
Post
#9
|
|
It's your world now. Group: Veterans Joined: 13-January 07 |
Simplest? In terms of keystrokes a semicolon or period is just one while "and" is four counting the space.
|
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 12:52 AM
Post
#10
|
|
The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady Group: Site Contributor Joined: 22-June 09 |
Well, not everyone knows how to use a semicolon correctly. If you want to keep it as a combined sentence, then I still say adding 'and' is the simplest solution.
But isn't this rather off-topic? |
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 12:53 AM
Post
#11
|
|
It's your world now. Group: Veterans Joined: 13-January 07 |
A period would still be simpler than the word and. Of course, I'm going based off the words given.
Nah, it's just fine. These posts speak to my lack of care toward the topic in question. |
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 12:58 AM
Post
#12
|
|
The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady Group: Site Contributor Joined: 22-June 09 |
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/lalatounge.gif)
That's the best argument I've ever heard for going off-topic. A period is the simplest, unless you want to keep the thoughts combined. In which case, I still vote for adding 'and'. |
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 01:05 AM
Post
#13
|
|
It's your world now. Group: Veterans Joined: 13-January 07 |
Yup, and would have worked just fine too. I'm just being argumentative (and thus not serious) because I really, really dislike football. Rather this new discussion on punctuation has amused me. Don't take it personally :P
|
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 01:13 AM
Post
#14
|
|
The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady Group: Site Contributor Joined: 22-June 09 |
Oh, I wasn't taking it personally.
I just enjoy a good argument, even if it is a trivial one about grammar. |
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 01:14 AM
Post
#15
|
|
It's your world now. Group: Veterans Joined: 13-January 07 |
Alright, just making sure :D I was beginning to feel like a jerk.
Also, it should have been "My friends and I." |
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 01:28 AM
Post
#16
|
|
The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady Group: Site Contributor Joined: 22-June 09 |
Nah. I generally don't take little arguments personally.
Yes, it should have been "My friends and I." I didn't even notice that! I feel bad for picking on Wolfy's grammar though. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lalaexdee.gif) I hope she doesn't mind. |
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 01:30 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Bigger. Better. Toaster. Group: Veterans Joined: 16-March 07 |
Even with the loss of Dwight Freeny, it was going to be a shootout anyway. And I think if it's Manning vs Brees, it'll be Manning prevailing.
|
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 01:32 AM
Post
#18
|
|
The Incredible Group: Veterans Joined: 13-October 09 |
I'm rooting for the Saints, I respect Peyton Manning as a great QB but I don't want him getting closer to Brady in the ring department.
The Saints are the underdog anyway and most neutral fans love an underdog, not to mention they have a pretty nice Super Bowl song. |
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 01:50 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Bigger. Better. Toaster. Group: Veterans Joined: 16-March 07 |
Normally I would, but I like Manning to be in the talk of the best of all time. Plus he's better than Brady so I want him to prove rings don't make you the best.
|
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 01:57 AM
Post
#20
|
|
The Incredible Group: Veterans Joined: 13-October 09 |
Manning had a much better offense than Brady for the majority of his career, when Brady finally did get great weapons in Moss and Welker he broke the single season TD record. Brady's always had the better defense and that's why he has rings but he also played pretty well in the postseason and Super Bowls, the guy's just clutch. Peyton Manning's playoff performance during his Super Bowl season was abysmal and he was up against Rex Grossman to win it.
Plus Brady's wife is hotter |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th January 2025 - 10:59 PM |