Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Superbowl XLIV, Colts or Saints?
General_Wolfy
post Feb 4 2010, 11:36 PM
Post #1


Member
Group: Veterans
Joined: 13-February 09



Well the Superbowl is this Sunday. Yay!
I'm pretty excited, I like football quite a bit. Not as much as baseball, but whatever.

I'm rooting for the Colts, I really hope they win! Me and my friends are having a big watch party. I can't wait. :D

So who are you rooting for?
Do you even care?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saffy
post Feb 4 2010, 11:48 PM
Post #2


It's your world now.
Group: Veterans
Joined: 13-January 07


The comma afters Colts is unnecessary.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crystal Talian
post Feb 5 2010, 12:29 AM
Post #3


The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady
Group: Site Contributor
Group Icon

Joined: 22-June 09


No, the comma is not unnecessary.

Anyway, I don't really care. I don't watch football . . . or any sports for that matter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Toaster Boy
post Feb 5 2010, 12:33 AM
Post #4


Bigger. Better. Toaster.
Group: Veterans
Joined: 16-March 07


I'm rooting for the Colts even though I'm a diehard Jets fan. I want to see Peyton get his second ring, he deserves it big time.

I care to an extent. I mean, I can't be too involved just because it isn't my team, but I do play football and like watching them play and observing moves.

Baseball is cool and all, but it's too slow paced to watch for me. Football is better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saffy
post Feb 5 2010, 12:36 AM
Post #5


It's your world now.
Group: Veterans
Joined: 13-January 07


Yes, the comma after Colts is so unnecessary. "Colts, or Saints," what's up with that? "Colts or Saints," please.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crystal Talian
post Feb 5 2010, 12:38 AM
Post #6


The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady
Group: Site Contributor
Group Icon

Joined: 22-June 09


I thought you were talking about the comma in the post, not the topic description. =/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saffy
post Feb 5 2010, 12:40 AM
Post #7


It's your world now.
Group: Veterans
Joined: 13-January 07


That comma after Colts in the post, I also believe should not exist. I feel a period or semicolon would be better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crystal Talian
post Feb 5 2010, 12:46 AM
Post #8


The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady
Group: Site Contributor
Group Icon

Joined: 22-June 09


The addition of the word 'and' after the comma in the post is the simplest solution.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saffy
post Feb 5 2010, 12:49 AM
Post #9


It's your world now.
Group: Veterans
Joined: 13-January 07


Simplest? In terms of keystrokes a semicolon or period is just one while "and" is four counting the space.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crystal Talian
post Feb 5 2010, 12:52 AM
Post #10


The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady
Group: Site Contributor
Group Icon

Joined: 22-June 09


Well, not everyone knows how to use a semicolon correctly. If you want to keep it as a combined sentence, then I still say adding 'and' is the simplest solution.

But isn't this rather off-topic?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saffy
post Feb 5 2010, 12:53 AM
Post #11


It's your world now.
Group: Veterans
Joined: 13-January 07


A period would still be simpler than the word and. Of course, I'm going based off the words given.

Nah, it's just fine. These posts speak to my lack of care toward the topic in question.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crystal Talian
post Feb 5 2010, 12:58 AM
Post #12


The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady
Group: Site Contributor
Group Icon

Joined: 22-June 09


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/lalatounge.gif)

That's the best argument I've ever heard for going off-topic.

A period is the simplest, unless you want to keep the thoughts combined. In which case, I still vote for adding 'and'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saffy
post Feb 5 2010, 01:05 AM
Post #13


It's your world now.
Group: Veterans
Joined: 13-January 07


Yup, and would have worked just fine too. I'm just being argumentative (and thus not serious) because I really, really dislike football. Rather this new discussion on punctuation has amused me. Don't take it personally :P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crystal Talian
post Feb 5 2010, 01:13 AM
Post #14


The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady
Group: Site Contributor
Group Icon

Joined: 22-June 09


Oh, I wasn't taking it personally.

I just enjoy a good argument, even if it is a trivial one about grammar.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saffy
post Feb 5 2010, 01:14 AM
Post #15


It's your world now.
Group: Veterans
Joined: 13-January 07


Alright, just making sure :D I was beginning to feel like a jerk.

Also, it should have been "My friends and I."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crystal Talian
post Feb 5 2010, 01:28 AM
Post #16


The Not-Quite-Crazy Cat Lady
Group: Site Contributor
Group Icon

Joined: 22-June 09


Nah. I generally don't take little arguments personally.

Yes, it should have been "My friends and I." I didn't even notice that! I feel bad for picking on Wolfy's grammar though. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lalaexdee.gif) I hope she doesn't mind.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Toaster Boy
post Feb 5 2010, 01:30 AM
Post #17


Bigger. Better. Toaster.
Group: Veterans
Joined: 16-March 07


Even with the loss of Dwight Freeny, it was going to be a shootout anyway. And I think if it's Manning vs Brees, it'll be Manning prevailing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Suiko
post Feb 5 2010, 01:32 AM
Post #18


The Incredible
Group: Veterans
Joined: 13-October 09


I'm rooting for the Saints, I respect Peyton Manning as a great QB but I don't want him getting closer to Brady in the ring department.

The Saints are the underdog anyway and most neutral fans love an underdog, not to mention they have a pretty nice Super Bowl song.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Toaster Boy
post Feb 5 2010, 01:50 AM
Post #19


Bigger. Better. Toaster.
Group: Veterans
Joined: 16-March 07


Normally I would, but I like Manning to be in the talk of the best of all time. Plus he's better than Brady so I want him to prove rings don't make you the best.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Suiko
post Feb 5 2010, 01:57 AM
Post #20


The Incredible
Group: Veterans
Joined: 13-October 09


Manning had a much better offense than Brady for the majority of his career, when Brady finally did get great weapons in Moss and Welker he broke the single season TD record. Brady's always had the better defense and that's why he has rings but he also played pretty well in the postseason and Super Bowls, the guy's just clutch. Peyton Manning's playoff performance during his Super Bowl season was abysmal and he was up against Rex Grossman to win it.

Plus Brady's wife is hotter
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
12 User(s) are reading this topic (12 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th January 2025 - 10:49 PM